Which statement accurately describes an "affected employee"?

An "affected employee" is defined as an individual who operates or uses a machine or equipment on which servicing or maintenance is being performed under lockout/tagout procedures. The primary consideration is that these workers might be exposed to hazards associated with the machinery that is undergoing service; thus, they have a vested interest in understanding the LOTO procedures to stay safe while work is being conducted.

In this specific case, the answer accurately reflects the situation of an affected employee as someone who interacts directly with machinery that is being serviced. This means they could potentially be at risk if proper lockout/tagout procedures are not followed. By being aware of these procedures, affected employees can avoid dangerous situations when maintenance activities are in progress.

The other options describe different roles related to the lockout/tagout process but do not fit the definition of an affected employee. For example, employees trained in LOTO procedures are typically referred to as authorized employees. Managers overseeing maintenance work may ensure compliance with safety protocols but are not directly involved in operating the machinery. Finally, employees conducting safety audits have responsibilities related to compliance and oversight rather than direct interaction with the equipment during servicing.